PD55-10 DISOBSTRUCTION AFTER RARP IN LOW-RISK PROSTATE CANCER: A CASE-CONTROL STUDY

  • Boni* A
  • Turco M
  • Cochetti G
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: As Active Surveillance (AS) become more prevalent in the community, more urologists are faced with the challenge of Bladder Outlet obstruction (BOO) in patients (pt) with Low-Risk Prostate Cancer (LR-PCa). Our aim was to evaluate the disobstructive capacity of full-Nerve Sparing Robot Assisted Radical Prostatectomy (fNSRARP) compared to a cohort of pt undergoing Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP). METHODS: On our database of 700 RARP, we retrospectively analyzed 80 ptwith LR-PCa with a median Follow Up (FU)of 18 months (range 12-36). We included only ptwith cT1c, GS <6, PSA <10 ng/ml, potentially eligible to AS according to recent evidences, with a BOO pattern at Uroflowmetry (UF) (Fmax <15 ml/s) and IPSS (>8). After cognitive fusion biopsy all pt underwent fNSRARP according to PERUSIA technique, with urethral maximization. Pt >70 yr, diabetic, with apical disease, prostate <50 gr, non sexual activity and with a FU <12 months were excluded. An age-matched cohort of 20 pt with comparable prostate volume who underwent HoLEP was recruited as a control group. All pt underwent UF, Uroflow Stop Test (UST), IPSS, ICS, IIEF-5 score preoperatively and at 12 months. Complications evaluated according to Clavien Dindo. Urinary Incontinence was assessed through UST at 12 months and direct interview (question number 5 of EPIC questionnaire). Positive UST test, and no pad use identify fully continent pt, the others were considered as incontinent. Potency was achieved when IIEF-5 was >17, with or without oral drug. Student T and Chi-square tests (SPSS®software) were used with a significance level <0.05. RESULTS: Table shows our results. Median catheterization time and hospital stay were 7 days (range 6-14) and 2 days (range 1-12); overall complications' rate was 25% (20) and 10% (2) respectively in the two groups. No major complications occurred. Positive surgical margin rate was 15% (12 pt), with upgrading occurred in 21pt (26,2%). No pt needed Radiotherapy. Pentafecta rate was 65% (48 pt). No statistical differences were detected between the two groups for studied parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Management of obstructed pt during AS is far to be determined and urologists must inform pt before choosing clinical strategy for LR-PCa. Beyond the good pentafecta rate, fNSRARP allows to achieve a BOO resolution at 1 year comparable to pt undergoing HoLEP.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Boni*, A., Turco, M., Cochetti, G., Guiggi, P., Del Zingaro, M., Lepri, E., … Mearini, E. (2019). PD55-10 DISOBSTRUCTION AFTER RARP IN LOW-RISK PROSTATE CANCER: A CASE-CONTROL STUDY. Journal of Urology, 201(Supplement 4). https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000557077.32756.e7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free