Convergent and concurrent validity of two measures of phonological processing

4Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The purposes of this study were to determine the degree to which two measures of phonological awareness/ability (Test of Phonological Awareness; Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing) correlate with each other and with a measure of reading (Letter-Word Identification), and to determine which of the individual measures of phonological ability best predict early reading skill in kindergarten children. With one exception, all correlations among measures of phonological awareness/ability were significant. In addition, all correlations among the phonological awareness measures and the reading measure were significant. Multiple regression analyses revealed that the combination of all predictor variables accounted for approximately 51% of the variability in scores on the Woodcock Letter-Word Identification subtest. The Phonological Awareness and the Rapid Naming composites of the CTOPP were the best predictors of performance on the measures of word identification. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Havey, J. M., Story, N., & Buker, K. (2002, September). Convergent and concurrent validity of two measures of phonological processing. Psychology in the Schools. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.10056

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free