The efficacy of adherence interventions for chronically ill children: A meta-analytic review

130Citations
Citations of this article
114Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objectives: To provide quantitative information about the overall effectiveness of adherence interventions to improve adherence and health outcomes for children with chronic illnesses. To evaluate statistically the potential moderators.Methods: A meta-analysis was performed on 71 adherence intervention studies. Results: Weighted-mean effect size (ES) across all the adherence outcomes for group design studies was in the medium range (mean d = 0.58) and for single-subject design studies was in the large range (mean d = 1.44). The weighted mean ES across all health outcome measures for studies using group designs was in the medium range (mean d = 0.40) and for studies using single-subject designs was in the large range (mean d = 0.74). Conclusions: Adherence interventions for children with chronic illnesses effectively increase adherence and result in some positive health benefits. Intervention and methodological variables had significant impact on ESs. High levels of heterogeneity characterized the data. © The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Pediatric Psychology. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Graves, M. M., Roberts, M. C., Rapoff, M., & Boyer, A. (2010, May). The efficacy of adherence interventions for chronically ill children: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Pediatric Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsp072

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free