A Re-analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial for Gastric Cancer Using Interval Censoring

7Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In a previous randomized clinical trial against curatively resected gastric cancer, we compared the effect of immunochemotherapy to chemotherapy and obtained significantly better survival and disease-free survival time (DFS) in a combined therapy group. Although DFS was analysed with a conventional approach in which the onset of relapse was defined as the diagnosis of relapse, we considered it necessary to re-analyse the data and compare the results of an interval-censored approach with the conventional approach, in order to examine whether the conclusion might be altered depending on the approach.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sakamoto, J., Teramukai, S., Nakazato, H., & Ohashi, Y. (1997). A Re-analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial for Gastric Cancer Using Interval Censoring. Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology, 27(6), 445–446. https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/27.6.445

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free