Why do residents choose the medical oncology specialty? Implications for future recruitment-results of the 2007 French Association of residents in oncology (AERIO) survey

23Citations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to analyze demography, motivation behind the choice of the medical oncology specialty, career plans, and the quality of training in medical oncology and to provide guidance to candidates for boosting the number of oncologists. Methods: In 2007, the French Association of Residents in Oncology conducted a nationwide study of all medical oncology residents in France. Results: The strongest factors that had influenced their decision to become a medical oncology specialist were an interest in medical oncology (98%), exposure to this branch of medicine during graduate training as a medical student (83%), interest in research (81%), and the diversity of the activity (75%). The mean score for the quality of training was 6 (0-10). More time for reading during working hours as well as for attending staff meetings and greater availability of teaching oncologists would improve the quality of training. The most popular career choice was working in a public hospital but most residents stated that they had not received adequate information about the different career plans. Conclusions: No data are available regarding how training in medical oncology is perceived. This study provides useful data for future policies to boost the number of oncologists. © The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Loriot, Y., Albiges-Sauvin, L., Dionysopoulos, D., Bouyon-Monteau, A., Boyle, H., You, B., … de La Motte Rouge, T. (2009). Why do residents choose the medical oncology specialty? Implications for future recruitment-results of the 2007 French Association of residents in oncology (AERIO) survey. Annals of Oncology, 21(1), 161–165. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdp294

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free