Abstract
National weather services now receive global model forecasts from a number of centers around the world. The existence of these forecasts raises the general question of how the operational forecaster can best use the information that the ensemble of predictions provides. There are two main outcomes of this study. First, the current subjective system of ranking the various models has been augmented with more objectively based performance measures. Second, these performance statistics provide guidance to the operational forecasters in a number of ways geographical regions with large systematic errors can be identified for each model; case studies are presented that illustrate the utility of the regional maps of bias, consistency, and divergence computed in this study; and, finally, there are regions of uncertainty where no model is consistently superior, so forecasts over these regions should be treated with caution. -from Authors
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Leslie, L. M., Hess, G. D., & Habjan, E. E. (1994). The performance of four global models over the Australian region. Weather & Forecasting, 9(2), 229–240. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0434(1994)009<0229:TPOFGM>2.0.CO;2
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.