Punishment insensitivity emerges from impaired contingency detection, not aversion insensitivity or reward dominance

41Citations
Citations of this article
58Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Our behaviour is shaped by its consequences – we seek rewards and avoid harm. It has been reported that individuals vary markedly in their avoidance of detrimental consequences, i.e. in their sensitivity to punishment. The underpinnings of this variability are poorly understood; they may be driven by differences in aversion sensitivity, motivation for reward, and/or instrumental control. We examined these hypotheses by applying several analysis strategies to the behaviour of rats (n = 48; 18 female) trained in a conditioned punishment task that permitted concurrent assessment of punishment, reward-seeking, and Pavlovian fear. We show that punishment insensitivity is a unique phenotype, unrelated to differences in reward-seeking and Pavlovian fear, and due to a failure of instrumental control. Subjects insensitive to punishment are afraid of aversive events, they are simply unable to change their behaviour to avoid them.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jean-Richard-dit-Bressel, P., Ma, C., Bradfield, L. A., Killcross, S., & McNally, G. P. (2019). Punishment insensitivity emerges from impaired contingency detection, not aversion insensitivity or reward dominance. ELife, 8. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.52765

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free