Comparison between classic and light touch massage on psychological and physical functional variables in athletes: A randomized pilot trial

9Citations
Citations of this article
59Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Despite the general belief of the benefits and the widespread use of massage in sport field, there are limited empirical data on possible effectiveness of massage on psychological and physical functional variables. Purpose: The main objective of the pres-ent study was to compare the effectiveness of classical and light touch massage on psychological and physical functional variables in athletes. Setting: Athletic club of Valencia Participants: 20 amateur athletes were recruited from two athletic clubs. Research Design: A single-blind, ran-domized, pilot-placebo trial. Intervention: The subjects were ran-domly allocated to two different groups: a) Massage group (MG) (n=10); b) Con-trol group (CG) (n=10). The intervention period lasted one month (one session per week). Main Outcome Measures: Assess-ment of the participants was performed at baseline and 24 hours following the completion of the intervention. Outcome measures included hip flexion, knee exten-sion, and mood state. Results: The results suggest that MG ob-tained better results on physical variables (p < .05). However, for both groups, trends suggest significant improvements in the overall mood state of the participants (p < .05). Conclusion: Our results suggest that classic massage could be an effective intervention to improve functional physical variables in athletes. However, trends suggest that a light touch intervention could provoke improvements in physi-ological measures.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Espí-López, G. V., Serra-Añó, P., Cuenca-Martínez, F., Suso-Martí, L., & Inglés, M. (2020). Comparison between classic and light touch massage on psychological and physical functional variables in athletes: A randomized pilot trial. International Journal of Therapeutic Massage and Bodywork: Research, Education, and Practice, 13(3), 30–37. https://doi.org/10.3822/ijtmb.v13i3.551

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free