Systematic review and meta-analysis of the quality-of-life of patients with parkinson’s disease

14Citations
Citations of this article
64Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Parkinson’s disease can adversely affect the quality-of-life. Aims: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of global literature on the quality-of-life of patients with Parkinson’s disease and examined the association between patient characteristics and quality-of-life. Methods: We searched Embase, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science from January 2000 to January 2020. We included articles published in English that used the Parkinson’s disease questionnaire to estimate the quality-of-life score and to identify the determinants of quality-of-life in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Results: In total, 41 studies with data from 4060 patients who had Parkinson’s disease met our inclusion criteria. The overall quality-of-life score was 32.37 (95% confidence intervals (CI): 28.72-36.01). Age and duration of disease were inversely related to quality-of-life (P 0.001). South America had the highest score on the questionnaire (39.73, 95% CI: 28.66-50.79, P 0.001), indicating the lowest quality-of-life of patients with Parkinson’s disease. Of the 6 World Health Organization regions, the Eastern Mediterranean Region had the highest score (36.28, 95% CI: 23.44-49.13, P 0.001). Conclusion: Although the global score in patients with Parkinson’s disease indicated an acceptable quality-of-life, there is a possibility for improvements. The findings of this study can inform evidence-based strategies by health policymakers and clinicians to enhance the quality-of-life of patients with Parkinson’s disease.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hoseinipalangi, Z., Kan, F. P., Hosseinifard, H., Doustmehraban, M., Masoumi, M., Rafiei, S., … Ghashghaee, A. (2023). Systematic review and meta-analysis of the quality-of-life of patients with parkinson’s disease. Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal. World Health Organization. https://doi.org/10.26719/emhj.23.013

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free