How subchronic and chronic health effects can be neglected for GMOS, pesticides or chemicals

42Citations
Citations of this article
136Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Chronic health effects are increasing in the world such as cancers, hormonal, reproductive, nervous, or immune diseases, even in young people. During regulatory toxicological subchronic tests to prevent these on mammalian health, prior commercialization of chemicals, including pesticides and drugs, or GMOs, some statistically significant findings may be revealed. This discussion is about the need to investigate the relevant criteria to consider those as biologically significant. The sex differences and the non linear dose or time related effects should be considered in contrast to the claims of a Monsanto-supported expert panel about a GMO, the MON 863 Bt maize, but also for pesticides or drugs, in particular to reveal hormone-dependent diseases and first signs of toxicities. © Ivyspring International Publisher.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Séralini, G. E., de Vendômois, J. S., Cellier, D., Sultan, C., Buiatti, M., Gallagher, L., … Dronamraju, K. R. (2009). How subchronic and chronic health effects can be neglected for GMOS, pesticides or chemicals. International Journal of Biological Sciences, 5(5), 438–443. https://doi.org/10.7150/ijbs.5.438

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free