Validity and reliability of the needs analysis instrument for the mathematics problem-solving module

  • Subramaniam S
  • Maat S
  • Mahmud M
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This research’s objective is to investigates the reliability and validity of the needs analysis instrument for mathematics problem-solving based on the computational thinking module among primary school mathematics teachers. For the needs analysis phase, the researchers applied a quantitative method involving a questionnaire. The instrument calibration method is test of language validity, content validity, empirical validity and reliability. The instrument’s reliability was tested in a pilot study involving 50 primary school mathematics teachers. The pilot study was analyzed using SPSS version 26. The pilot test results show that Cronbach’s alpha value for Construct A: computational thinking skills is 0.786, Construct B: problem-solving skills is 0.772, and the need for the problem-solving module is 0.775. Finally, the researcher expects that this instrument will assist other researchers in the needs analysis phase of developing a mathematical module based on computational thinking in problem-solving. Keywords: Validity, reliability, mathematics, module, computational

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Subramaniam, S., Maat, S. M., & Mahmud, M. S. (2022). Validity and reliability of the needs analysis instrument for the mathematics problem-solving module. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 17(12), 4518–4529. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v17i12.7836

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free