A comparison of intrascleral bleb height by anterior segment OCT using three different implants in deep sclerectomy

23Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Purpose To compare intrascleral blebs characteristics after deep sclerectomy (DS) with three intrascleral implants using the Visante anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Methods This is a cross-sectional study including 60 eyes of 51 patients that underwent DS with Sk-Gel, Esnoper, and Aquaflow implant. Intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement, slit-lamp examination, and Visante scans were performed the same day in all the patients. Visante scans were done through the intrascleral bleb at 45 1, 901, and 135 1 and the bleb height was measured. Results Sk-Gel was used in 19 eyes (31.66%), Esnoper in 22 eyes (36.66%), and Aquaflow in 19 eyes (31.66%). The median time lapsed from the surgery was 15.50 months 25th and 75th percentiles (p25 8.25;p75 20). The median IOP was 13 mm Hg (p25 10; p 75 15), with no signi-ficant differences among implants (P = 0.232). Overall, the correlation between the scleral bleb height and the IOP was statistically significant at 451 (r = -0.359; P = 0.004), 901 (r = -0.410; P = 0.001), and 135 1 (r = -0.417; P = 0.001). However, Sk-Gel did not show any statistically significant correlation between the scleral height and IOP whereas the other two groups (Esnoper and Aquaflow) showed a significant correlation. There were no differences in the bleb height among implants. Conclusion There was a moderate inverse correlation between the scleral bleb height and the IOP measurement after DS with Esnoper and Aquaflow implants. There were no differences in bleb height among the three implants. © 2012 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fernández-Buenaga, R., Rebolleda, G., Casas-Llera, P., Muñoz-Negrete, F. J., & Pérez-López, M. (2012). A comparison of intrascleral bleb height by anterior segment OCT using three different implants in deep sclerectomy. Eye, 26(4), 552–556. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2011.358

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free