Do different governance actors approach the concept of network governance differently within a developing fragile society?

Abstract

In recent years, the concept of network governance has become a central theme in public administration literature. Our study gauges the level of receptivity to the networking model among the three sectors: government, business and civil society, represented by 24 key individuals occupying leadership positions in their organizations. The West Bank is the focus of our analysis as it is formalizing its network governance model that arose out of necessity during the Covid-19 pandemic. We identify the attitudes of those networks tasked with implementing the programme, thereby highlighting where opportunities for successful implementation exist and where barriers can be overcome. Q methodology was chosen for collecting, processing and analyzing data as it is most adept at measuring individual perceptions. The article identifies three very closely aligned perspectives. All are supportive of the proposed change in governance arrangements. The research identifies subtly different expectations among stakeholders on network governance and raises questions about the suitability of network governance for the fragile society. It also suggests a parallel education program on the role of stakeholders in a different system of governance, if the reform is to be a success.