Preoperative neutrophil:lymphocyte and platelet:lymphocyte ratios predict endometrial cancer survival

110Citations
Citations of this article
65Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background:Variations in systemic inflammatory response biomarker levels have been associated with adverse clinical outcome in various malignancies. This study determined the prognostic significance of preoperative neutrophil:lymphocyte (NLR), platelet:lymphocyte (PLR) and monocyte:lymphocyte (MLR) ratios in endometrial cancer.Methods:Clinicopathological and 5-year follow-up data were obtained for a retrospective series of surgically treated endometrial cancer patients (n=605). Prognostic significance was determined for overall (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) using Cox proportional hazards models and Kaplan-Meier analysis. Receiver-operator characteristic and log-rank functions were used to optimise cut-offs. NLR, PLR and MLR associations with clinicopathological variables were determined using non-parametric tests.Results:Applying cut-offs of ≥2.4 (NLR), ≥240 (PLR) and ≥0.19 (MLR), NLR and PLR (but not MLR) had independent prognostic significance. Combining NLR and PLR scores stratified patients into low (NLR-low and PLR-low), intermediate (NLR-high or PLR-high) and high risk (NLR-high and PLR-high) groups: multivariable hazard ratio (HR) 2.51; P<0.001 (OS); HR 2.26; P<0.01 (CSS) for high vs low risk patients. Increased NLR and PLR were most strongly associated with advanced stage (P<0.001), whereas increased MLR was strongly associated with older age (P<0.001).Conclusion:Both NLR and PLR are independent prognostic indicators for endometrial cancer, which can be combined to provide additional patient stratification.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cummings, M., Merone, L., Keeble, C., Burland, L., Grzelinski, M., Sutton, K., … Orsi, N. M. (2015). Preoperative neutrophil:lymphocyte and platelet:lymphocyte ratios predict endometrial cancer survival. British Journal of Cancer, 113(2), 311–320. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2015.200

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free