Economic and financial viability evaluation model for the implementation of waste recycling plants construction in Brazilian municipalities

6Citations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This work had as main objective to develop an evaluation model for analyzing the economic and financial feasibility of implementing Construction and Demolition Waste Recycling Plants (URRCD) in Brazilian municipalities. The evaluation model proposed for the Investment Project (IP) under study was performed using the business model Canvas, the business plan, the multiindex method proposed by Souza and Clemente (2009) and expanded by Lima et al. (2015) through the $AVEPI Web app. Also, a sensitivity analysis was performed, through the elasticity limits and limit values as well as a stochastic analysis using the Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS). From the proposition of this model, it was applied in a case study in Pato Branco, Paraná. The results showed that there is economic and financial viability in the implementation of this IP, since the average Net Present Value (NPV) is about R$ 583,919.87 and the investment recovery will materialize in 12 years (Payback). Through MCS, it was observed that there is a high probability (99.78%) that the investment in the URRCD of Pato Branco, Paraná, be profitable. However, the elasticity indices showed that it is necessary to monitor the expected revenues and the estimated costs with more attention. Thus, it will require a work by the managers of the URRCD, in favor of always seeking to increase the demand for recycled aggregates, as a way to increase the revenue of the plant, as long as it does not exceed its production capacity.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gularte, L. C. P., de Lima, J. D., Oliveira, G. A., Barichello, R., & Pinto, M. A. N. (2020). Economic and financial viability evaluation model for the implementation of waste recycling plants construction in Brazilian municipalities. Engenharia Sanitaria e Ambiental, 25(2), 281–291. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1413-41522020193153

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free