Abstract
Many believe that an upward-sloping life is better than a downward-sloping life because of its shape. This is a common way of formulating the shape of a life hypothesis. We argue that the hypothesis is mistaken. We need not assume that there is something intrinsically valuable in the shape of one's life to justify the tendency to judge an upward-sloping life as better than a downward sloping one. Instead, we can appeal to more fundamental and less controversial claims to justify such a judgment. What one might justifiably judge to be better are features of lives which are often (though not necessarily) correlated with, rather than constituted by, an upward slope.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Hersch, G., & Weltman, D. (2025). It’s Not the Slope that Matters: Well-Being and Shapes of Lives. Journal of Moral Philosophy, 22(1–2), 97–124. https://doi.org/10.1163/17455243-20244139
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.