Left ventricular electromechanical dyssynchrony and mortality in cardiothoracic intensive care

  • Tavazzi G
  • Bojan M
  • Duncan A
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Introduction Global left ventricular electromechanical dyssynchrony (GLVD) is uncoordinated LV contraction that reduces the extent of intrinsic energy transfer from the myocardium to the circulation leading to a reduction in peak LV pressure rise, prolonged total isovolumic time (t-IVT) and fall in stroke volume [1]. This potentially important parameter is not routinely assessed in critically ill cardiothoracic patients. Methods A prospective analysis of retrospectively collected data in cardiothoracic ICU patients who underwent echocardiography was performed. In addition to epidemiological factors, echo data included comprehensive assessment of LV/RV systolic and diastolic function including Doppler analysis of isovolumic contraction/relaxation, ejection time (ET) and f lling time (FT). t-IVT was calculated as (60 -(total ET + total FT)) and the Tei Index as (ICT + IRT)/ET. t-IVT >14 second/minute and Tei index >0.48 were used to define GLVD [2]. Data are shown as mean ± SD/median (interquartile range). Results A total of 103 patients (63.5 ± 18.4 years), 65 male (63%), APACHE II score (14.6 ± 7.4) were included. The prevalence of GLVD was high (24/103, 22%) and associated with significantly increased mortality, 7.5% vs. 25% (P = 0.02). There was no difference in requirement for cardiorespiratory support between the two populations, but there were significant differences (no GLVD vs. GLVD) in requirement for pacing (35% vs. 62%, P = 0.02), atrial f brillation (20% vs. 41%, P = 0.03), QRS duration (92.0 (80.0 to 120.0) vs. 116.5 (95.0 to 154.0), P = 0.01) and QTc (460.0 (416.0 to 498.5) vs. 477.5 (451.2 to 541.0), P = 0.02). There was no significant difference in ejection fraction (no GLVD 43.0 (35.0 to 49.5) vs. GLVD 39.6 (29.5 to 49.7), P = 0.43), mitral regurgitation (40.5% vs. 62.5%, P = 0.06), or any other measures of LV systolic or diastolic function between the two groups. There was good correlation between the two methods used to assess dyssynchrony (LV t-IVT:LV Tei index correlation coeficient = 0.80, P <0.001). Conclusion GLVD that limits cardiac output is common in the cardiothoracic ICU, and significantly related to mortality. When diagnosed, the underlying cause should be sought and treatment instigated to minimize the t-iVT (pacing optimization/revascularization/inotrope titration/volaemia optimization).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tavazzi, G., Bojan, M., Duncan, A., Vazir, A., & Price, S. (2013). Left ventricular electromechanical dyssynchrony and mortality in cardiothoracic intensive care. Critical Care, 17(S2). https://doi.org/10.1186/cc12110

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free