Lung Ultrasound Artifacts Interpreted as Pathology Footprints

10Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: The original observation that lung ultrasound provides information regarding the physical state of the organ, rather than the anatomical details related to the disease, has reinforced the idea that the observed acoustic signs represent artifacts. However, the definition of artifact does not appear adequate since pulmonary ultrasound signs have shown valuable diagnostic accuracy, which has been usefully exploited by physicians in numerous pathologies. Method: A specific method has been used over the years to analyze lung ultrasound data and to convert artefactual information into anatomical information. Results: A physical explanation of the genesis of the acoustic signs is provided, and the relationship between their visual characteristics and the surface histopathology of the lung is illustrated. Two important sources of potential signal alteration are also highlighted. Conclusions: The acoustic signs are generated by acoustic traps that progressively release previously trapped energy. Consequently, the acoustic signs highlight the presence of acoustic traps and quantitatively describe their distribution on the lung surface; they are not artifacts, but pathology footprints and anatomical information. Moreover, the impact of the dynamic focusing algorithms and the impact of different probes on the visual aspect of the acoustic signs should not be neglected.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Demi, M., Soldati, G., & Ramalli, A. (2023). Lung Ultrasound Artifacts Interpreted as Pathology Footprints. Diagnostics, 13(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13061139

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free