Impact of the preoperative C-reactive protein to albumin ratio on the long-term outcomes of hepatic resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

12Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: The present study aimed to investigate the impact of preoperative C-reactive protein to albumin (CRP/Alb) ratio on the long-term outcomes of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). Methods: 82 patients who underwent hepatic resection for mass-forming type of ICC were evaluated. The relationship between preoperative CRP/Alb ratio and survival outcomes was investigated. Results: The optimal cutoff value of CRP/Alb ratio for assessing overall survival (OS) was determined as 0.089. Univariate analysis for recurrence-free survival (RFS) showed that CRP/Alb ratio >0.089, carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) >37 U/mL, lymph node metastasis, vascular invasion, and multiple tumors were significantly associated with postoperative recurrence. On multivariate analysis, the independent prognostic factors identified were CRP/Alb ratio >0.089 (p < 0.001), lymph node metastasis (p = 0.006), and multiple tumors (p < 0.001). Univariate analysis for OS showed that CRP/Alb ratio >0.089, CA 19-9 >37 U/mL, lymph node metastasis, vascular invasion, multiple tumors, and positive surgical margin were significantly associated with overall death. On multivariate analysis, the independent prognostic factors identified were CRP/Alb ratio >0.089 (p < 0.001), lymph node metastasis (p = 0.01), and multiple tumors (p = 0.005). Conclusion: Preoperative CRP/Alb ratio may predict poor long-term outcomes after hepatic resection in patients with ICC.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ito, T., Shinkawa, H., Takemura, S., Tanaka, S., Nishioka, T., Miyazaki, T., … Kubo, S. (2020). Impact of the preoperative C-reactive protein to albumin ratio on the long-term outcomes of hepatic resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 21(8), 2373–2379. https://doi.org/10.31557/APJCP.2020.21.8.2373

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free