Influencer–Follower Interactions and Consumers' Behavioral Responses: A Multi-Method Approach and Future Research Agenda

4Citations
Citations of this article
65Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This review critically synthesizes and extends the influencer marketing literature by exploring how relational, psychological, and contextual mechanisms shape consumers' behavioral responses in digital environments. Adopting a multi-method research approach, Study 1 presents an extensive TCCM (Theory, Context, Characteristics, and Methodology)–guided systematic literature review of 172 articles to identify key theoretical foundations, empirical trends, methodological approaches, and research themes. Study 2 complements this with 18 in-depth interviews with academic experts and industry practitioners, offering deeper interpretive insights and contextual relevance of the findings. Together, these studies uncover central thematic drivers, including content and narrative strategies, psychological mechanisms, platform dynamics, and sponsorship disclosure. The findings imply that relational, narrative, and identity-based mechanisms have a greater influence on consumers' behavioral outcomes, including engagement behavior, psychological reaction, and symbolic alignment than rational and informational appeals. Therefore, this review advances the field by integrating affective, symbolic, and contextual variables into an overarching framework and suggests a future research agenda to address current theoretical and methodological deficiencies. The study offers a robust foundation for influencer marketing scholarship that is both contextually adaptable and psychologically grounded.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Alim, M. A., Thaichon, P., Quach, S., & Weaven, S. (2026, January 1). Influencer–Follower Interactions and Consumers’ Behavioral Responses: A Multi-Method Approach and Future Research Agenda. Journal of Consumer Behaviour. John Wiley and Sons Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.70056

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free