Stereotype threat effects on older adults’ episodic and working memory: A meta-analysis

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Prior research has shown that exposure to negative age-based stereotype threat (ST) can undermine older adults’ memory performance. The objective of the current meta-analysis was to examine the reliability and magnitude of ST effects on older adults’ episodic and working memory performance—two forms of memory that typically show the greatest age-related declines. In addition, we examined potential moderators of age-based ST including type of ST manipulation, type and timing of memory task, participant age and education level. Research Design and Method: A total of 23 samples for episodic memory and 15 samples for working memory were derived from 19 published and 4 unpublished articles and analyzed in two separate meta-analyses. Results: Analyses revealed a reliable effect of ST on both older adults’ episodic (d = 0.253) and working memory performance (d = 0.373). Interestingly, the age-based ST effect was only significant when blatant ST manipulations were used with episodic memory tasks or when subtle ST manipulations were used with working memory tasks. Moreover, within episodic memory, the ST effect only reached significance for recall but not cued-recall or recognition performance, and for immediate but not delayed tests of memory. Neither age nor level of education moderated the association between ST and older adults’ memory performance. Discussion and Implications: These results highlight the vulnerability of both older adults’ episodic and working memory performance to age-based ST. When measuring older adults’ memory performance in a research context, we must therefore be wary of exposing participants to common stereotypes about aging and memory.