Cross Correlation versus Mutual Information for Image Mosaicing

  • Ghannam S
  • Lynn A
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper reviews the concept of image mosaicing and presents a comparison between two of the most common image mosaicing techniques. The first technique is based on normalized cross correlation (NCC) for registering overlapping 2D images of a 3D scene. The second is based on mutual information (MI). The experimental results demonstrate that the two techniques have a similar performance in most cases but there are some interesting differences. The choice of a distinctive template is critical when working with NCC. On the other hand, when using MI, the registration procedure was able to provide acceptable performance even without distinctive templates. But generally the performance when using MI with large rotation angles was not accurate as with NCC.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ghannam, S., & Lynn, A. (2013). Cross Correlation versus Mutual Information for Image Mosaicing. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 4(11). https://doi.org/10.14569/ijacsa.2013.041113

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free