Biomechanical force profiles and force decrease of direct printed versus thermoformed aligners with different trimlines: an in vitro analysis

0Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: This in-vitro study aimed to evaluate and compare the biomechanical force profiles of thermoformed and direct-printed aligners with different gingival trimlines during facial and palatal translation of a maxillary central incisor. Methods: A 3D-printed model with a mounted central incisor was used to simulate 0.25 mm of bodily movement. Forces were recorded in three axes (Fx, Fy, Fz) using a multi-axis force sensor. Three aligner types (thermoformed with straight trimline: TFAS, and direct-printed with either straight: DPAS or garlanded trimline: DPAG) were tested (n = 10 each). Vertical, transverse, and sagittal force components and their decrease were analyzed. Forces were recorded over 60 min to characterize initial force delivery and early stress relaxation under standardized in vitro conditions. Results: Thermoformed aligners exhibited the highest sagittal forces during facial movement (Fx − 0.70 N), while DPAG demonstrated significantly lower forces (Fx − 0.25 N; p

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wiechens, B., Meyer-Marcotty, P., von Waldthausen, E., Mai, L. M., Schmid, J. Q., Brockmeyer, P., … Quast, A. (2026). Biomechanical force profiles and force decrease of direct printed versus thermoformed aligners with different trimlines: an in vitro analysis. Progress in Orthodontics, 27(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-026-00627-0

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free