Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Matematis Siswa: Studi dengan Model Probing-Prompting dan Konvensional

  • Kristin N
  • Ditasona C
  • Lumbantoruan J
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
40Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study aims to determine how students critical thinking ability who study with probing-prompting and conventional learning models are. This research is a quantitatif research with a quasi-experimental design group. The research population was all students of class X SMK Setih Setio 2 Muara Bungo, Jambi. The research sample consisted of two classes with a sample size of 62 people determined by simple random sampling, namely X MM as the control class using the conventional learning model and X AK as the experimental class using the Probing-Prompting learning model. Requirements analysis test has been carried out so that the data obtained are not normally distributed and not homogeneous. The hypotheses were analyzed using the U-Mann Whitney test at a significant level of α=0,05. Based on data analysis and hypothesis testing, it was found that: (1) there were differences in students' critical thinking skills taught using probing-prompting and conventional learning models, and (2) there is an increase in students' critical thinking skills taught by using probing-prompting and conventional models.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kristin, N., Ditasona, C., & Lumbantoruan, J. H. (2021). Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Matematis Siswa: Studi dengan Model Probing-Prompting dan Konvensional. Brillo Journal, 1(1), 20–28. https://doi.org/10.56773/bj.v1i1.7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free