Who pays the price? Socio-ecological controversies regarding the energy transition in South America

3Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Transformations linked to more sustainable energy and economic systems may have societal and ecological costs, which some people and territories must assume. Controversies might emerge associated with developing new productive chains, e.g., transition mineral activity. This study examines the relations among energy transition, society, and the environment, focusing on copper as a high-tech mineral and considering Bolivia, Chile, and Peru, three countries with mining-dependent economies. This work tries to see if countries are becoming more renewable, efficient, and modern and if this correlates with copper activity and societal factors. As a result, Bolivia has pending tasks on both the energy demand and production sides. Despite presenting good performance on renewables and efficiency, Chile and Peru have pending tasks associated with the ecological distribution regarding mining and energy sectors. Mining-based economies might expose the fragility of green transitions in meeting sustainable goals considering equality, justice, and ecosystem care.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

González, A. B. P. (2022). Who pays the price? Socio-ecological controversies regarding the energy transition in South America. Sustentabilidade Em Debate, 13(3), 72–95. https://doi.org/10.18472/SustDeb.v13n3.2022.44799

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free