Ethical lessons from the 'undercover nurse': Implications for practice and leadership

2Citations
Citations of this article
57Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: The case of Margaret Haywood, the 'undercover nurse', is a significant one for the UK's National Health Service (NHS). She investigated complaints made about the Royal Sussex County Hospital and covertly filmed inpatients experiencing care detrimental to their health. The material was subsequently broadcast on the BBC's Panorama programme. It caused a scandal and brought about changes at the hospital, as well a demand for greater clinical leadership. Margaret Haywood was, however, struck off the nursing register for breaching confidentiality and because of the methods she used to blow the whistle. Methods: The authors apply the ethical lenses of purpose, principle, people and power to explore this case. Results: This is a morally ambiguous situation in which both the protagonist and the organisation compromised their core values. The undercover nurse used individuals as a means to a 'higher' end, and the Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust are seen to have deviated from the ethical to the business map, in a contradiction of what the health service represents. Conclusions: These deficits can be repaired by reinforcement of the ethics of duty and ideals on a practical level and the involvement of clinicians to lead at a management level, to act as a moral compass.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Grant, P. (2010). Ethical lessons from the “undercover nurse”: Implications for practice and leadership. Journal of Medical Ethics, 36(8), 469–472. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2010.035626

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free