Abstract
Objective A commercially available CT-guided robot offers enhanced abilities in planning, targeting, and confirming accurate needle placement. In this short communication, we describe our first UK experience of robotic interventional oncology procedures. Methods We describe the device, discuss installation, operation, and report upon needle insertion success, accuracy (path deviation; PD and tip deviation; TD), number of adjustments, complications, and procedural success. Results Nine patients (seven males), median age 66 years (range 43-79) were consented for biopsy or ablation between March and April 2021. Needle placement in biopsy was more accurate than ablation (median 1 vs 11 mm PD and 1 vs 20 mm TD) and required fewer adjustments (median 0 vs 5). No complications arose, and all procedures were successful (diagnostic material obtained or complete ablation at follow-up). Conclusion Short procedure times and very high levels of accuracy were readily achieved with biopsy procedures, although tumour ablation was less accurate which likely reflects higher procedural complexity.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Johnston, E. W., Basso, J., Winfield, J., Mccall, J., Khan, N., Messiou, C., … Fotiadis, N. (2022). Starting CT-guided robotic interventional oncology at a UK centre. British Journal of Radiology, 95(1134). https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20220217
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.