Comparison of clinical and pathological characteristics between screen-detected and self-detected breast cancers: A Hong Kong study

7Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction: Breast cancer is the leading cause of death of Hong Kong women with increasing incidence. This study aimed to determine any prognostic differences between screen-detected and self-detected cases of breast cancer in a cohort of Hong Kong patients. Methods: This was a case series with internal comparison carried out in a private hospital in Hong Kong. Approximately 3000 cases of Chinese patients diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ or invasive breast cancer were reviewed. Results: The screen-detected group showed better pathological characteristics than the self-detected group. Number of lymph nodes involved, invasive tumour size, and tumour grade were more favourable in the screen-detected group. There was also a lower proportion of patients with pure invasive ductal carcinoma and mastectomy in the screen-detected group. Conclusion: This study provides indirect evidence that women in the local population may gain clinical benefit from regular breast cancer screening. The findings need to be validated in a representative population of Hong Kong women.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lau, S. S. S., Cheung, P. S. Y., Wong, T. T., Ma, M. K. G., & Kwan, W. H. (2016). Comparison of clinical and pathological characteristics between screen-detected and self-detected breast cancers: A Hong Kong study. Hong Kong Medical Journal, 22(3), 202–209. https://doi.org/10.12809/hkmj154575

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free