Evidence for benefit of percutaneous coronary intervention for chronically occluded coronary arteries (cto) - clinical and health economic outcomes

3Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Percutaneous revascularisation of a coronary chronic total occlusion (CTO) remains one of the technical frontiers of interventional cardiology. CTOs are common, and yet intervention is only attempted in 10 % of cases. CTO procedures are perceived to be technically challenging, lengthy, associated with significant risk and have only limited data to support the practise. Recent technical advances have dramatically increased the success rate, shortened procedural time and improved clinical outcomes. The aim of this article is to critically examine the data that supports CTO intervention, including specifically an appraisal of procedural safety, benefit and overall cost effectiveness.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rawlins, J., Wilkinson, J., & Curzen, N. (2014). Evidence for benefit of percutaneous coronary intervention for chronically occluded coronary arteries (cto) - clinical and health economic outcomes. Interventional Cardiology: Reviews, Research, Resources, 9(3), 190–194. https://doi.org/10.15420/icr.2014.9.3.190

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free