Abstract
Aim: To assess real-world clinical outcomes with standard therapies for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) with METexon14 skipping mutation (METex14). Methods: In an oncologists-led retrospective review of medical records, data were abstracted and analyzed for patients initiating first-line (1L) systemic therapy after 1 January 2017. Results: In total 287 aNSCLC patients with METex14, the real-world best overall response rate was 73.4% for capmatinib (n = 146), 68.8% for immunotherapy (IO) monotherapy (n = 48), 52.0% for chemotherapy (CT, n = 30), and 54.8% for IO + CT (n = 63). As compared with capmatinib, patients receiving IO (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.57; 95% CI: 0.77–3.20; p = 0.220), CT (HR: 2.41; 95% CI: 1.19–4.85; p = 0.014) and IO + CT (HR: 2.33; 95% CI: 1.35–4.04; p = 0.003) had higher rates of progression. Further, patients receiving CT (HR: 4.43; 95% CI: 1.54–12.75; p = 0.006) and IO + CT (HR: 3.53, 95% CI: 1.41-8.85; p = 0.007) had higher rates of mortality than patients receiving capmatinib. Conclusion: The study showed better clinical outcomes with capmatinib than other standard therapies in 1L setting for aNSCLC harboring METex14.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Furqan, M., Karanth, S., Goyal, R. K., Cai, B., Rombi, J., Davis, K. L., … Saliba, T. (2024). Effectiveness of standard treatments in non-small-cell lung cancer with METexon14 skipping mutation: a real-world study. Future Oncology, 20(22), 1553–1563. https://doi.org/10.2217/fon-2023-1064
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.