Effectiveness of standard treatments in non-small-cell lung cancer with METexon14 skipping mutation: a real-world study

4Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Aim: To assess real-world clinical outcomes with standard therapies for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) with METexon14 skipping mutation (METex14). Methods: In an oncologists-led retrospective review of medical records, data were abstracted and analyzed for patients initiating first-line (1L) systemic therapy after 1 January 2017. Results: In total 287 aNSCLC patients with METex14, the real-world best overall response rate was 73.4% for capmatinib (n = 146), 68.8% for immunotherapy (IO) monotherapy (n = 48), 52.0% for chemotherapy (CT, n = 30), and 54.8% for IO + CT (n = 63). As compared with capmatinib, patients receiving IO (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.57; 95% CI: 0.77–3.20; p = 0.220), CT (HR: 2.41; 95% CI: 1.19–4.85; p = 0.014) and IO + CT (HR: 2.33; 95% CI: 1.35–4.04; p = 0.003) had higher rates of progression. Further, patients receiving CT (HR: 4.43; 95% CI: 1.54–12.75; p = 0.006) and IO + CT (HR: 3.53, 95% CI: 1.41-8.85; p = 0.007) had higher rates of mortality than patients receiving capmatinib. Conclusion: The study showed better clinical outcomes with capmatinib than other standard therapies in 1L setting for aNSCLC harboring METex14.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Furqan, M., Karanth, S., Goyal, R. K., Cai, B., Rombi, J., Davis, K. L., … Saliba, T. (2024). Effectiveness of standard treatments in non-small-cell lung cancer with METexon14 skipping mutation: a real-world study. Future Oncology, 20(22), 1553–1563. https://doi.org/10.2217/fon-2023-1064

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free