Degradation of S-metolachlor in soil as affected by environmental factors

58Citations
Citations of this article
46Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

S-Metolachlor is a promising alternative to metolachlor; however, there are concerns about its environmental fate following soil application. The present study was conducted to investigate the effects of several environmental factors on the degradation rate of S-metolachlor in soil. The rate of S-metolachlor degradation in soil under different conditions was determined by extracting and detecting residual levels over a 60 d incubation period. Degradation of S-metolachlor in the five tested soils followed the first-order kinetics, yielding the half-lives (T1/2) varying from 26.3 to 40.1 d, which was significantly controlled by soil organic matter (OM) content. The degradation rate of S-metolachlor in 1#soil increased with increasing temperature. The first-order half-lives ranged from 23.7 d at 35 °C to 64.8 d at 10 °C. Soil moisture content influenced the rate of herbicide degradation in the following order: 80 > 60 > 40 > 20% for 1#soil. The degradation rate of S-metolachlor in sterilized soil was 3.3 times slower than in corresponding unsterilized soil, indicating that microbial degradation was the predominant contributors to dissipation of S-metolachlor in soil. The degradation rate of S-metolachlor decreased as the initial concentration increased. These findings might have practical implications for the environmental fate of S-metolachlor in the agricultural soil. Environmental factors, especially soil OM, temperature and moisture, should be considered in combination with the minimum effective application rate of S-metolachlor for achieving satisfactory weed-control efficacy, reducing herbicide runoff, and minimizing effects on environmental quality.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Long, Y. H., Li, R. Y., & Wu, X. M. (2014). Degradation of S-metolachlor in soil as affected by environmental factors. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 14(1), 189–198. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-95162014005000015

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free