Comparison between creatinine and cystatin C-based GFR equations in renal transplantation

63Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background. Estimation of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) from serum creatinine (Scr) or cystatin C (Cys C) exhibit variable performances. Methods. We compared the performances of 14 Scr and 9 Cys C estimated GFR equations using inulin clearance (Clin) as the reference test in 103 stable renal transplant populations. Bias, precision, receiving operation characteristics (ROC), accuracy within 30% ranges from the reference method and agreements of each test were compared. Results. Mean Clin was 46.4 ± 20.9 ml/min/1.73 m2. Scr and Cys C levels correlated well with each other (r = 0.83, P < 0.0001) and with Clin (r ± -0.57 and -0.53, P < 0.001, respectively). ROC analysis demonstrated no superiority of Cys C over Scr. Gats equation achieved the highest accuracy of 70% in patients with GFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m2. In patients with GFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m2, the Nankivell equation demonstrated the highest accuracy of 73.91%. Cys C-based equations were not depicted to be thoroughly accurate. Bias, precision and agreement were otherwise similar in all GFR tests. Conclusion. Scr-based equations did not appear to be inferior to Cys C-based equations as a means to estimate GFR in renal transplant patients. © The Author [2007]. Published by Oxford Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zahran, A., Qureshi, M., & Shoker, A. (2007). Comparison between creatinine and cystatin C-based GFR equations in renal transplantation. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, 22(9), 2659–2668. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfm243

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free