Forced migration magnitude and violence in international crises: 1945-2015

4Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This study focuses on forced migration and interstate violence during international crises, as amajor security concernwith salientimplications forinternational relations stability. The empirical data consists of 229 crises designated as Forced Migration Crises (FMC), identified within the 374 crises of the International Crisis Behavior (ICB) project. The study outlines a framework for analyzing FMC compared with Non-Forced Migration Crises (NFMC), presents an index of Forced Migration Magnitude (FMM), and probes three hypotheses. It points to transformations in forced migration since WWII, compares crises with and without forced migration, and explores patterns of FMM and violence. Results lead to rejection of hypothesis 1 on similarities between FMC and NFMC, supporting hypothesis 2 on considerable diversitybetween them. Findingsonextended scope, strategiclocale, enduring forced migration problems and increased violence support hypothesis 3, challenging the placement of forced migration merely as a social or humanitarian domestic concern. Instead, results show a salient increase in FMM, coupled with more severe interstate violence and war, dangerously destabilizing regions worldwide. These patterns require the integration of forced migration within crisis frameworks, as a new research agenda, tounderstand thenatureof forcedmigrationin the 21stcentury andits impact.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ben-Yehuda, H., & Goldstein, R. (2020). Forced migration magnitude and violence in international crises: 1945-2015. Journal of Refugee Studies, 33(2), 336–357. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/feaa039

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free