OPTIMIZATION VERSUS RESPONSE‐STRENGTH ACCOUNTS OF BEHAVIOR

  • Vaughan W
  • Miller H
69Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Pigeons were run in both single‐key and concurrent‐key experiments in which, over most of the range of response rates, an increase in response rate gave rise to a continuous decrease in reinforcement rate. In spite of the fact that a low response rate would have produced a high reinforcement rate, all birds responded at relatively high rates, thus keeping reinforcement rates substantially below the maximum possible. In the concurrent‐key experiment, in addition to responding at relatively high rates, the birds' ratios of responses approximately matched the corresponding ratios of obtained reinforcers. The results are inconsistent with most theories of optimal performance, which assume that organisms behave in ways that either maximize reinforcement value or minimize deviations from a free‐behavior point. On the other hand, the results are consistent with the assumption that reinforcement strengthens the tendency to respond.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Vaughan, W., & Miller, H. L. (1984). OPTIMIZATION VERSUS RESPONSE‐STRENGTH ACCOUNTS OF BEHAVIOR. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 42(2), 337–348. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1984.42-337

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free