Resisting moral wiggle room: How robust is reciprocal behavior?

50Citations
Citations of this article
93Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We provide the second mover in a trust game and a moonlighting game with an excuse for not reciprocating. While this type of manipulation has been shown to strongly reduce giving in the dictator game, we find that the availability of the excuse has no effect on the incidence of reciprocal behavior in these games. Our results cast doubt on the generalizability of previous dictator game findings and suggest that image concerns are not a key driver of reciprocal behavior.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

van der Weele, J. J., Kulisa, J., Kosfeld, M., & Friebel, G. (2014). Resisting moral wiggle room: How robust is reciprocal behavior? American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 6(3), 256–264. https://doi.org/10.1257/mic.6.3.256

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free