Moral vegetarianism vs. Moral omnivorism

4Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

It is supererogatory to refrain from eating meat, just as it is supererogatory to refrain from driving cars, living in apartments, and wearing makeup, for the welfare of animals. If all animals are equal, and if nonhuman omnivores, such as bears and baboons, are justified in killing the members of other species, such as gazelles and buffaloes, for food, humans are also justified in killing the members of other species, such as cows, pigs, and chickens, for food. In addition, it is fair for humans to eat animals because humans are also eaten by animals.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Park, S. (2017). Moral vegetarianism vs. Moral omnivorism. Human Affairs, 27(3), 289–300. https://doi.org/10.1515/humaff-2017-0024

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free