Circulatory responses to airway stimulation and cervical epidural blockade

30Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In order to investigate the effects of acute cardiac sympathectomy, the circulatory responses due to tracheal intubation and bronchocarinal stimulation were compared in lightly anesthetized, paralyzed patients who had either cervical (n = 18) or lumbar epidural blockade (n = 18), or neither (n = 12). The mean analgesic levels obtained using 2% mepivacaine with epinephrine were C4-T8 in the cervical group, and T7-S1 in the lumbar group. Increases in arterial blood pressure (AP) and heart rate (HR) due to laryngoscopy were significant (P < 0.01) but similar in the three groups of patients. Broncho-carinal stimulation by a suction catheter did not produce noticeable changes in AP and HR in the cervical group; significant increases were observed in the other two groups (P < 0.01). It was concluded from this study that acute sympathectomy induced in part by cervical or lumbar epidural block does not attenuate circulatory responses due to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation. The cervical blockade, however, can prevent such responses due to broncho-carinal stimulation without predominant vagotonic reflexes; this may be attributed to the interruption of sympathetic afferents to the spinal cord at the epidural level.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dohi, S., Nishikawa, T., Ujike, Y., & Mayumi, T. (1982). Circulatory responses to airway stimulation and cervical epidural blockade. Anesthesiology, 57(5), 359–363. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-198211000-00002

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free