Synthetic Unit Hydrograph Methods: A Critical Review

  • Bhunya P
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
138Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The present study critically reviews the synthetic unit hydrograph (SUH) methods available in hydrologic literature. The study reveals that the traditional methods of SUH derivation, e.g., Snyder, SCS, traditional methods like Snyder and TS method that does not yield satisfactory results, and their application to the practical engineering problems is tedious and combursome. On the other hand, probability distribution functions (pdfs) based SUH methods are easy to apply, and easily meet the UH criterion, i.e. the area under the curve is unity, and rely on a stronger mathematical base and sounder hydrologic perception. The recent pdfs used for deriving UHs in ungauged catchments, address the SUH shapes with more flexibility than the earlier pdfs proposed by [1] for SUH derivation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bhunya, P. K. (2011). Synthetic Unit Hydrograph Methods: A Critical Review. The Open Hydrology Journal, 5(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874378101105010001

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free