Paraconsistent Vagueness: Why Not?

  • Hyde D
  • Colyvan M
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The idea that the phenomenon of vagueness might be modelled by a paraconsistent logic has been little discussed in contemporary work on vagueness, just as the idea that paraconsistent logics might be fruitfully applied to the phenomenon of vagueness has been little discussed in contemporary work on paraconsistency. This is prima facie surprising given that the earliest formalisations of paraconsistent logics presented in Jaśkowski(1948) and Halldén(1949) were presented as logics of vagueness. One possible explanation for this is that, despite initial advocacy by pioneers of paraconsistency, the prospects for a paraconsistent account of vagueness are so poor as to warrant little further consideration. In this paper we look at the reasons that might be offered in defence of this negative claim. As we shall show, they are far from compelling. Paraconsistent accounts of vagueness deserve further attention.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hyde, D., & Colyvan, M. (2008). Paraconsistent Vagueness: Why Not? The Australasian Journal of Logic, 6. https://doi.org/10.26686/ajl.v6i0.1798

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free