Methotrexate patient education: A quality improvement study

14Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective. To determine patients' knowledge of the safe use and toxicity of methotrexate (MTX) and to define educational interventions implemented by a rheumatology nurse that improved patients' understanding of MTX therapy. Methods. One hundred eighty-three patients from a university-based rheumatology clinic who were taking MTX completed an initial knowledge questionnaire concerning the proper use and possible toxicity of MTX. Following completion, a nurse reviewed the correct answers with each patient and provided written information on MTX. One hundred thirty-eight of these patients completed a followup questionnaire at the next visit or by mail. The questionnaires were analyzed, and a total MTX knowledge score was calculated. Results. MTX knowledge improved significantly between questionnaires; mean total score (± SD) increased from 7.32 ± 3.99 to 10.23 ± 3.29 (P < 0.001). After accounting for a person's initial questionnaire score, the addition of a supplemental 'MTX pocket-card' was associated with a higher score on the followup questionnaire (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 2.37; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.14, 4.95; P = 0.021). Patients over age 55 were 4 times more likely to have a poorer score compared with patients under age 45 (adjusted OR = 0.23; 95% Cl 0.07, 0.73; P = 0.013). Conclusion. Knowledge of the toxicity and safe use of MTX was significantly improved by a patient education program utilizing a rheumatology nurse. Older individuals appear to be at higher risk for knowledge deficits. A supplemental MTX pocket-card proved to be a simple but beneficial addition to our MTX educational program.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Burma, M. R., Rachow, J. W., Kolluri, S., & Saag, K. G. (1996). Methotrexate patient education: A quality improvement study. Arthritis and Rheumatism, 9(3), 216–222. https://doi.org/10.1002/1529-0131(199606)9:3<216::AID-ANR1790090310>3.0.CO;2-5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free