Comparison of Dentist Preference towards Software Based Versus Handwritten Prescriptions in Pediatric Dental Patients- A Mixed Methods Study

  • Kamath S
  • Jawdekar A
  • Katre A
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction: Prescriptions for children must be with accurate drug dosages and clear instructions. A digital tool to write, save and send prescriptions can potentially overcome the limitations of hand-written prescriptions. A preliminary mixed methods study comparing a novel ‘app-based’ and handwritten prescriptions in pediatric dental settings is reported. Methodology: Eighteen post-graduate students from departments of pediatric dentistry of two dental schools participated in this mix-methods crossover study. An android app prototype PREASY was indigenously developed to make digital prescriptions. The handwritten and app-based prescriptions were compared in terms of time taken (seconds), precision (accuracy, legibility and clarity) and satisfaction (Likert rating). The mean time taken was compared using t-test, accuracy was compared using ANOVA and satisfaction using a Chi squared test. Qualitative feedback was obtained regarding the PREASY app. Results: The mean time taken for handwritten prescriptions {154.28(+ 54.06)seconds} was almost three times higher than that for the app based prescriptions (54.22 (+ 25.66)seconds} [Student ‘t’ test P < .00001]. The mean differences for accuracy, legibility and clarity were 1.36 + 0.66, 1.39 + 0.44 1.11 + 0.50, respectively and were statistically non-significant (P=.247). A majority of participants were very satisfied or satisfied (94.45%); and the remaining (5.55%), were neutral, dissatisfied or very dissatisfied, [Chi square test, P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kamath, S., Jawdekar, A., & Katre, A. (2021). Comparison of Dentist Preference towards Software Based Versus Handwritten Prescriptions in Pediatric Dental Patients- A Mixed Methods Study. Journal of Pharmaceutical Research International, 41–49. https://doi.org/10.9734/jpri/2021/v33i41a32300

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free