Innovation paradox and ambidextrous organization: A case study on development teams of air conditioner in Haier

7Citations
Citations of this article
98Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

While knowledge exploration and exploitation represent two distinct activities requiring corresponding organizational arrangements, new product development calls for a dynamic combination of the two. Based on a systematic review of the paradox between knowledge exploration and exploitation and various resolving strategies, this research extends the construct of organizational ambidexterity from dual structure to ambidextrous capabilities, and suggests a dialectical method for reconciling this paradox at lower organizational levels. Based on a case study on the development teams of air conditioner in Haier, we find that ambidexterity is a multi-level construct existing not only at the organization level but also at lower levels such as teams and individuals like model managers. © Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH 2009.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fengbin, W., & Hong, J. (2009). Innovation paradox and ambidextrous organization: A case study on development teams of air conditioner in Haier. Frontiers of Business Research in China, 3(2), 271–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11782-009-0014-2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free