A Debate on Public Health Responses to COVID-19: Focused Protection versus Sustained Suppression

9Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

With the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic persisting for a long time, there have been debates about the public health response strategies. We conducted a survey of adult infectious disease specialists on public health responses to COVID-19. Most responded that regulations on multi-use facilities should be maintained or strengthened, but schools should not be closed, except in cases where an outbreak occurs within the school. A slightly higher percentage of experts supported focused protection rather than sustained suppression. While the focused protection strategy might sufce in low-level epidemic situations, social distancing should be reinforced by shifing to a strategy closer to sustained suppression in the eventuality of rapid spread of outbreaks.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Song, J. Y., Peck, K. R., & The Korean Society of Infectious Diseases. (2020). A Debate on Public Health Responses to COVID-19: Focused Protection versus Sustained Suppression. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 35(49). https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e433

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free