Abstract
With the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic persisting for a long time, there have been debates about the public health response strategies. We conducted a survey of adult infectious disease specialists on public health responses to COVID-19. Most responded that regulations on multi-use facilities should be maintained or strengthened, but schools should not be closed, except in cases where an outbreak occurs within the school. A slightly higher percentage of experts supported focused protection rather than sustained suppression. While the focused protection strategy might sufce in low-level epidemic situations, social distancing should be reinforced by shifing to a strategy closer to sustained suppression in the eventuality of rapid spread of outbreaks.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Song, J. Y., Peck, K. R., & The Korean Society of Infectious Diseases. (2020). A Debate on Public Health Responses to COVID-19: Focused Protection versus Sustained Suppression. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 35(49). https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e433
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.