Visualizing clinical evidence: Citation networks for the incubation periods of respiratory viral infections

14Citations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Simply by repetition, medical facts can become enshrined as truth even when there is little empirical evidence supporting them. We present an intuitive and clear visual design for tracking the citation history of a particular scientific fact over time. We apply this method to data from a previously published literature review on the incubation period of nine respiratory viral infections. The resulting citation networks reveal that the conventional wisdom about the incubation period for these diseases was based on a small fraction of available data and in one case, on no retrievable empirical evidence. Overall, 50% of all incubation period statements did not provide a source for their estimate and 65% of original sources for incubation period data were not incorporated into subsequent publications. More standardized and widely available methods for visualizing these histories of medical evidence are needed to ensure that conventional wisdom cannot stray too far from empirically supported knowledge. © 2011 Reich et al.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Reich, N. G., Perl, T. M., Cummings, D. A. T., & Lessler, J. (2011). Visualizing clinical evidence: Citation networks for the incubation periods of respiratory viral infections. PLoS ONE, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019496

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free