Advantage of Volume Scanning Video Disdrometer in Solid-Precipitation Observation

4Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study developed a volume scan-type disdrometer and investigated the size distribution of solid-precipitation particles observed by flux- and volume-scan type disdrometers, installed in 2016-2017 winter in Sapporo, Japan. The former disdrometer detected particles, by line sensors, of which frequency is proportional to the particle number per area. On the other hand, the latter directly observed the particle number per volume using an image sensor. The flux-scan data are known to have the bias of more frequency in higher-speed (or larger-size) particles, but this bias was hardly corrected due to the error of estimated particles' velocity. It was first validated that the volume scan-type disdrometer could observe particle size between 0.5 mm and 13 mm, consistently with the flux scan-type one. Then, we examined how many events showed the difference of the size distribution between the two disdrometers with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. The result showed that 84% of the total events examined fell into the class where they were significantly different, partially due to fast-falling graupels.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Katsuyama, Y., & Inatsu, M. (2021). Advantage of Volume Scanning Video Disdrometer in Solid-Precipitation Observation. Scientific Online Letters on the Atmosphere, 17, 35–40. https://doi.org/10.2151/SOLA.2021-006

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free