RapidPlan knowledge based planning: Iterative learning process and model ability to steer planning strategies

76Citations
Citations of this article
80Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: To determine if the performance of a knowledge based RapidPlan (RP) planning model could be improved with an iterative learning process, i.e. if plans generated by an RP model could be used as new input to re-train the model and achieve better performance. Methods: Clinical VMAT plans from 83 patients presenting with head and neck cancer were selected to train an RP model, CL-1. With this model, new plans on the same patients were generated, and subsequently used as input to train a novel model, CL-2. Both models were validated on a cohort of 20 patients and dosimetric results compared. Another set of 83 plans was realised on the same patients with different planning criteria, by using a simple template with no attempt to manually improve the plan quality. Those plans were employed to train another model, TP-1. The differences between the plans generated by CL-1 and TP-1 for the validation cohort of patients were compared with respect to the differences between the original plans used to build the two models. Results: The CL-2 model presented an improvement relative to CL-1, with higher R2 values and better regression plots. The mean doses to parallel organs decreased with CL-2, while D1% to serial organs increased (but not significantly). The different models CL-1 and TP-1 were able to yield plans according to each original strategy. Conclusion: A refined RP model allowed the generation of plans with improved quality, mostly for parallel organs at risk and, possibly, also the intrinsic model quality.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fogliata, A., Cozzi, L., Reggiori, G., Stravato, A., Lobefalo, F., Franzese, C., … Scorsetti, M. (2019). RapidPlan knowledge based planning: Iterative learning process and model ability to steer planning strategies. Radiation Oncology, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-019-1403-0

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free