Systematic Evaluation of Affinity Enrichment Methods for O-GlcNAc Proteomics

8Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

O-Linked β-N-acetylglucosamine (O-GlcNAc) modification (i.e., O-GlcNAcylation) on proteins plays critical roles in the regulation of diverse biological processes. However, protein O-GlcNAcylation analysis, especially at a large scale, has been a challenge. So far, a number of enrichment materials and methods have been developed for site-specific O-GlcNAc proteomics in different biological settings. Despite the presence of multiple methods, their performance for the O-GlcNAc proteomics is largely unclear. In this work, by using the lysates of PANC-1 cells (a pancreatic cancer cell line), we provided a head-to-head comparison of three affinity enrichment methods and materials (i.e., antibody, lectin AANL6, and an OGA mutant) for site-specific O-GlcNAc proteomics. The enriched peptides were analyzed by HCD product-dependent EThcD (i.e., HCD-pd-EThcD) mass spectrometry. The resulting data files were processed by three different data analysis packages (i.e., Sequest HT, Byonic, and FragPipe). Our data suggest that each method captures a subpopulation of the O-GlcNAc proteins. Besides the enrichment methods, we also observe complementarity between the different data analysis tools. Thus, combining different approaches holds promise for enhanced coverage of O-GlcNAc proteomics.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hou, C., Wu, C., Wu, Z., Cheng, Y., Li, W., Sun, H., & Ma, J. (2024). Systematic Evaluation of Affinity Enrichment Methods for O-GlcNAc Proteomics. Journal of Proteome Research, 23(10), 4422–4432. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jproteome.4c00388

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free