The lockdown effect: A counterfactual for Sweden

67Citations
Citations of this article
81Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

While most countries imposed a lockdown in response to the first wave of COVID-19 infections, Sweden did not. To quantify the lockdown effect, we approximate a counterfactual lockdown scenario for Sweden through the outcome in a synthetic control unit. We find, first, that a 9-week lockdown in the first half of 2020 would have reduced infections and deaths by about 75% and 38%, respectively. Second, the lockdown effect starts to materialize with a delay of 3–4 weeks only. Third, the actual adjustment of mobility patterns in Sweden suggests there has been substantial voluntary social restraint, although the adjustment was less strong than under the lockdown scenario. Lastly, we find that a lockdown would not have caused much additional output loss.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Born, B., Dietrich, A. M., & Müller, G. J. (2021). The lockdown effect: A counterfactual for Sweden. PLoS ONE, 16(4 April 2021). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249732

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free