The use of isolated limb infusion in limb threatening extremity sarcomas

13Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This paper reports a single-institution experience with the use of isolated limb infusion for limb salvage in locally advanced, unresectable, recurrent limb threatening soft tissue sarcomas. Background: Locally advanced, limb threatening soft tissue sarcomas (STS) pose a significant treatment challenge. We report our experience using isolated limb infusion (ILI) in patients with unresectable extremity STS. Methods: A total of 22 patients with extremity STS underwent 26 ILIs with melphalan and dactinomycin. Patient characteristics, intra-operative parameters and toxicity were recorded. Outcome measures included limb-salvage and in-field response rates. Results: Of the 19 lower and 7 upper extremity ILIs, Wieberdink grade III toxicity or less was observed in all. Median followup was 11 months. A total of 17 patients were evaluable at 3 months post-ILI with an overall response rate of 42%. Four (24%) had complete response (CR), three (18%) partial response (PR), three (18%) stable disease (SD) and seven (41%) progressive disease (PD). Twelve of 17 (71%) underwent successful limb preservation at a median of 9 months post-ILI. Two (12%) were downstaged to resectable disease and remain showing no evidence of disease (NED) after surgery at 30 and 22 months post-ILI. Conclusions: ILI is an attractive modality that provides regional disease control and limb preservation in patients with limb threatening sarcoma. Although short-term results appear encouraging, long-term follow-up is needed to fully assess the role of ILI in unresectable extremity STS. © 2013 Informa UK Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Vohra, N. A., Turaga, K. K., Gonzalez, R. J., Conley, A., Reed, D., Bui, M. M., … Zager, J. S. (2013). The use of isolated limb infusion in limb threatening extremity sarcomas. International Journal of Hyperthermia, 29(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3109/02656736.2012.740548

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free