Efektifitas Pelaksanaan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (PKPU) dalam Mencegah Kepailitan (Studi Pengadilan Niaga pada Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat)

  • Rifani R
  • Fauziah F
  • Fahruddin M
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
91Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The results showed that the Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations or PKPU means that it can be used by debtors to avoid bankruptcy. So before declared as bankruptcy, debtors can apply for PKPU. PKPU applications are submitted to the Commerrcial Court established within the General Court. In 2017, 2018 and 2019 the Commercial Court at Central Jakarta District Court has received many incoming PKPU case reports and continues to increase every year. PKPU that has been accepted and determined can be submitted as a peace plan by the debtor, the peace plan is submitted to resolve debt settlement disputes between debtors and creditors, PKPU can be considered effective if PKPU submitted by the debtor ends with peace. In addition, the driving factor for PKPU's effectiveness in preventing bankruptcy is the content of the peace agreement that has been homologated by the Commercial Court.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rifani, R. A., Fauziah, F., & Fahruddin, M. (2021). Efektifitas Pelaksanaan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (PKPU) dalam Mencegah Kepailitan (Studi Pengadilan Niaga pada Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat). Jurnal Hukum Jurisdictie, 3(2), 145–160. https://doi.org/10.34005/jhj.v3i2.57

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free